Category Archive: murder

Justice for Du Doan

On September 1st of 2007, John J. Haley, 31 at the time, was charged with the murder of Du Doan, 62. Doan and others were fishing at Montrose Harbor. Haley was reported as having previous altercations with other Asian-American fisherman, including being charged for battery and assault, and police reports indicated that Haley had previously targeted Asian Americans and an Asian looking man in altercations initiated by Haley. Despite all of that, the police had not called the murder a hate-crime.

“… members of the Asian-American community who gathered at a vigil on Saturday said they believe he was targeted because of his race.“There were a lot of people out at the harbor early that morning from different backgrounds. Why did the alleged perpetrator pick on those individuals?” said Ben Lumicao, an adviser on the city’s Commission on Human Relations.

Doan, a father of three, was a Vietnamese immigrant. … Vigil organizers said they were relieved that a man was charged last week in the Sept. 1 killing of Doan, who was pushed into the water. But the fact that the suspect allegedly targeted two other men who appeared to be Asian seems more than a coincidence…

John J. Haley, 31, of Chicago was charged Wednesday (2007) with first-degreemurder in Doan’s drowning and aggravated battery for a similar incident on July 31 at Montrose Harbor that involved a man who appeared to be Asian. Authorities allege that Haley was behaving erratically last weekend when he confronted another Asian fisherman and later shoved Doan into the water. Doan could not swim and died within seconds, police said. Because the Illinois Hate Crimes Statute applies to misdemeanors, it did not apply to Haley’s felony charges, Quon said. Prosecutors use the law to upgrade a misdemeanor to a Class 4 felony if the offender acted because of race, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation or physical or mental disability.”

That being said, on October 23, The Chicago Sun Times Criminal Courts Reporter wrote about Haley’s conviction for involuntary manslaughter in fisherman’s death. I was particularly disturbed by this reporter’s account which no doubt was presented by his defense attorneys:

“John Haley was a drunken “jag off” and “pea-brain” when he pushed a fisherman into Lake Michigan as a prank, his lawyers said. But Haley didn’t know Du Doan, 62, couldn’t swim. He didn’t know the Vietnamese immigrant would drown when he shoved him off the pier at Montrose Harbor, running away laughing as Doan desperately flailed his arms in the water.”

What does anyone expect when they push an elderly man into the water where there is retaining wall and no ladders, so much that his body flew far enough to determine this was a homicide? One does not take these actions unless a person intends to harm another human being.


Haley, 33, may be a “fool,” but he isn’t a murderer, Haley’s attorneys, Marc Gottreich and Timothy Grace, contended at his murder trail this week. After 7 1/2 hours of deliberation, a Cook County jury apparently agreed with that assessment late Friday, convicting Haley of involuntary manslaughter but acquitting him of first-degree murder charges. “The jury got it right,” Grace said. Haley “didn’t mean to kill the guy.”

So tell me, Mr. Grace, what exactly did your client intend when he pushed this old man who was minding his own business fishing at the pier, into water that he could not have hoped to have escaped from? Even a seasoned swimmer would have had problems because there is a retaining wall there, versus a wooden pier and/or a ladder that one could climb.

Even more disturbing: “Haley will face two to five years in prison when he is sentenced Nov. 19.” TWO to FIVE years for taking a life? For deliberately causing harm to another human being which resulted in his death? What also disturbs me is the race issue. It isn’t just that an elderly Asian American immigrant was targeted on the basis of his race. This jury did not find his life valuable enough to honor it with a verdict that fit Haley’s crime. Would this same jury have found in the same manner if the victim was instead a middle class non immigrant Caucasian woman?

Or is there a class issue here, as well, or one of ageism, that dismisses the fact that his life was taken because he was an older man? What if the victim were a beautiful and wealthy Asian American woman in the prime of her life, who was a corporate executive, would this jury have found this hypothetical victim more worthy of a different outcome?

Today, Circuit Judge John P. Kirby honored Du Doan homicide by rejecting the jury’s outcome:

“This was a cowardly act, pushing an elderly man who he could not even look in the eye…and this defendant though that was funny,” Circuit Judge John P. Kirby said. “These actions are reprehensible and should not be allowed in civilized society.”
“… defense attorneys argued Haley was drunk and seeking a thrill when he pushed Doan, who could not swim, into the harbor as his back was turned in September 2007.

Kirby rejected that excuse.

“A thrill seeker puts himself in danger,” Kirby said. “A coward puts others in danger.”

Involuntary manslaughter carries a sentence ranging from probation to five years in prison, but Haley’s prior felony drug conviction allowed Kirby to extend the prison term to 10 years.

Doan’s family members said the loss of the man left an “indescribable void.”

For the story posted by Matthew Walberg of the Chicago Tribune:

http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2009/12/john-haley-du-doan-vietnamese-fisherman-montrose-harbor.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ChicagoBreakingNews+%28Chicago+Breaking+News%29

Share

© 2009-2013 Tamale Chica Chronicles All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright

Switch to our mobile site